While surfing the local sex offender support forum

( http://www.corrupted-justice.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=9239&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0 )

I came across an article that has even the sex offenders themselves going ANTI.

http://www.winnipegsun.com/News/Winnipeg/2008/03/23/5078496-sun.html

'Maybe I'm a monster'
Perv videotaped sex-abuse of seven-year-old
By DEAN PRITCHARD, SUN MEDIA

A Winnipeg man is agreeing to be designated a long-term offender after admitting he raped a seven-year-old girl almost daily for a year and forced her to watch videotapes of the abuse.

"There's no excuse for any of it ... I clearly need help," the man told court at a sentencing hearing earlier this month.

The man -- who cannot be named to protect the identities of his victims -- has pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual assault involving two young girls and possession of child pornography.

Judge Janice LeMaistre adjourned sentencing until later this spring so his long-term offender designation can be formally approved by Manitoba Justice.

As a long-term offender, the man would be subject to intensive supervision for up to 10 years following his release from prison.

"Clearly, there needs to be a great deal of very tight and extensive supervision once he comes back into the community," said Crown attorney Mick Makar.

Court heard the man abused the victims, aged six and seven, when he became romantically involved with their mothers. In 1998, the man was babysitting the six-year-old girl when he forced her to perform oral sex on him. The girl did not disclose the assault until 2004, the same year he was arrested for repeatedly assaulting the older girl.

The man was living in the same apartment building as the seven-year-old and her mother when he became romantically involved with the woman in 2002, Makar told court. When babysitting the girl, the man would tie her to his bed and videotape himself sexually assaulting her. On other occasions, he made the girl watch the videotapes while continuing to assault her, Makar said.

ALMOST DAILY ASSAULTS

The almost daily assaults ended in January 2004 when the girl reported the abuse to her mother and the man was arrested. He has been in custody since then.

Police seized the man's computer and found more than 270 images of child pornography involving children as young as seven and pornographic stories involving fathers and daughters.

The Crown is seeking a prison sentence of 10 years for the second victim and a consecutive sentence for the first victim. Defence lawyer Chris Sigurdson is recommending a total sentence of 10 years, minus double credit of eight years for time already served.

"He would be the first one to acknowledge he poses a serious risk," Sigurdson said. "He truly wants to get help."

According to a psychiatrist's report prepared for court, the man believed his seven-year-old victim was "curious" about sex and that she would be "damaged emotionally if he made her feel guilty about it."

The man said he was "out of control" and would routinely slap, shove or intimidate the seven-year-old victim to get what he wanted. The man admitted to his psychiatrist he may always pose a risk to the community.

"Maybe I'm a monster," he said. "I have a problem and society may not want me back on the street."



Interestingly enough, sex offenders and others in their forums made almost the exact same comments that parents across the continent have made.... and were labeled vigilantes for doing so.

Some of those comments were:


Chrysalis
True conversationalist
Joined: 24 Mar 2006
Posts: 3921
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:52 am


I came across a story yesterday about a man in the US who raped his girlfriends 5 month old baby while her 18 year old mother was at school. Horrific story.The baby girl was rushed into surgery for massive trauma from the incident. My husband leaned over my shoulder as I was reading it and his face just turned white. You know all that anger and hatred spewed by the PJ crew?I felt that way when I read about this poor baby.

Chrysalis goes on to say:

This part struck me as odd.
Quote:
A Winnipeg man is agreeing to be designated a long-term offender after admitting he raped a seven-year-old girl almost daily for a year and forced her to watch videotapes of the abuse.

Agreeing? Who the hell gave the son of a bitch a choice?I am ashamed of our legal system here in Manitoba.He did it and by his own admission he's a monster and therefore he deserves no choice to be called sex offender. Did those babies have a choice? Hell no.


Truthseeker
Frequent Poster
Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Posts: 39
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:24 pm


Why such petty sentences? Take the guy out back and execute him immediately!



Truthseeker also posts:


Execute him. He had no problem executing his victim's life did he? He is beyond mental help. Some countries dont give a shit about protecting children. I've no problem supporting the death penalty in this case and I think it might (big might) cut down on child rape if people like this were immediately executed. He gets a slap on the wrist, So greater is the chance the next child rapist will get a slap as well. No real justice has been served here and he will be released one day and put more children in harms way. If he was executed, Then he wouldnt pose any future danger to children. No public outcry on the sentencing Judge either. Execute him/her as well.


Even the owners of the forum are not too happy with this story:

SupremeJustice
Corrupted Justice Management
Joined: 24 Apr 2005
Posts: 2420
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:26 am

Sick bastard. There should be more severe consequences for this horrid crime against children.

Quote:
The Crown is seeking a prison sentence of 10 years for the second victim and a consecutive sentence for the first victim. Defence lawyer Chris Sigurdson is recommending a total sentence of 10 years, minus double credit of eight years for time already served.

10 years is not enough.
No double credit of 8years either.
IMO, Let him rot in jail.
Maybe it's time for a new Private Prison Sector to house certain sexual offenders.
Narrower and more specific categorization of sex offenses is needed.
Some people do need to be kept off the streets, granted, that need isn't limited to sex offenses.

And he also posts:


Any amount of abuse can be devastating and traumatic. They're all victims. Keep this guy in jail for life and use any funds that would have been spent on his later supervision to help the victim get professional mental health services.


Now call me crazy, but doesn't this sound like the same things that parents, victims advocates, ANTI's, and pedohunters say?
Well I guess all the members of Corrupted Justice are vigilantes (if I used "pedo-logic" LMAO)